What an architecture review delivers
I read your codebase the way a new senior hire would, then write up what is slowing you down and how to fix it in priority order. The output is a short, concrete document your team can act on - not abstract advice.
Typical findings: tangled state, missing component boundaries, a design system nobody trusts, inconsistent data fetching, and folder structures that hide dependencies instead of revealing them.
- Component and feature boundary design
- State management strategy (server, client, URL, form)
- Design system structure: primitives to product
- Monorepo vs polyrepo and module boundaries
- Testing strategy aligned to the architecture
